Texture Mapping extension

Re: Texture Mapping extension
Orion Pobursky Wrote:
Joshua Delahunty Wrote:I don't have an issue with ratification, despite the advice that ratification by the LSC has often killed innovation in the past, but rest assurred that we plan to continue our work and to expand the specification as necessary, whether it's fully "external" or not.

Can I have an example of this? In fact, I can't think of any currently ratified spec that wasn't internally developed by the LSC or one of it's members.

The advice I received was that, once ratified, most tech never really continued to be innovated forward in a major fashion.

I wasn't provided examples, however.

It's quite possible that, once a technology is ratified, it's reached near enough to its potential that it no longer has much room for additional features, and there is a measure of coincidence involved.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Tim Gould - 2012-04-14, 22:08
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Joshua Delahunty - 2012-04-21, 20:16
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Tim Gould - 2012-11-15, 22:51
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Tim Gould - 2012-11-30, 21:55

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)