Texture Mapping extension


Re: Texture Mapping extension
#19
Joshua Delahunty Wrote:When I worked with James (and then Terry, and Steve), the goal was to invent means to get our work done, not have rules and roadblocks and limitations on our work. This is why I decided (and told Travis over a year ago) that I didn't want the LSC's involvement.

I'd like to point out here that I totally misinterpreted the email he sent me over a year ago where he meant that he didn't want the LSC's involvement. Re-reading it after he re-forwarded it to me, I can see in retrospect what he meant, but I didn't understand it at the time. (I know that seems strange, but the context was a response to an email I sent him which was totally unrelated to textures.)

Having said that, I've always felt as Allen does, which is that the point of the meta is so that textures can be used in official parts, and that can't happen without LSC ratification.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Travis Cobbs - 2012-04-13, 5:37
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Tim Gould - 2012-04-14, 22:08
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Tim Gould - 2012-11-15, 22:51
Re: Texture Mapping extension - by Tim Gould - 2012-11-30, 21:55

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)