Roland Melkert Wrote:Brendan Mauro Wrote:If I had to vote for which program to match, I would say Lpub3D all the way - but maybe this needs to be discussed with Trevor to ensure some consistency.The rotstep meta is a lglite/mlcad step meta extension, so I figured it needs to act like a normal step but with camera control.
This document seems to agree with this (chapter 6)
http://lm-software.com/mlcad/Specification_V2.0.pdf
So technically this could be a LPub bug? Or maybe it's such an old issue it became the new behavior? Is there more software using it as a info meta only?
Whoops, I spoke too soon. LPub does recognize a ROTSTEP as a step. What I was seeing was LPub being smart and recognizing that multiple STEPs or ROTSTEPs with no parts between them as null and not printing blank steps as a result. So a STEP followed by some metadata and a ROTSTEP is still considered one step.