Willy Tschager Wrote:* The title of the single pages should be LDraw OMR - <set number> not viceversaI indeed noticed that it was the other way around on the main LDraw site. I don't really mind if it's one way or the other. I'll change it in the next version.
* The title of the all files page should be LDraw OMR - All available files, same goes for Statistics and About
Willy Tschager Wrote:* Latest files should also carry a rendering rather than a pic of the box.Yup. I was using set-pictures because I wanted (and actually still want) to skip the file-images and use a browser based viewer. That didn't work, but I never changed the latest-files images. It's already on the list of things to do in the next revision.
Willy Tschager Wrote:* On the single page the "4349 Ken Drew [Ken]" should also carry the set name "4349-1 - Wild Pod - Ken Drew [Ken]"Interesting one. Never noticed that. Indeed no reason to only show the set number.
Willy Tschager Wrote:* On the single page there should also be the themeYou mean on a file-page, where you can see the file-header? I skipped the theme (and all other set info), because it's a file-page. There's a difference between the two, a set page is focussed on a single set and shows all set data including all the related files. A file-page shows information about the file with a link to the set (which has the set information).
Willy Tschager Wrote:* Being known as extrem nitpicker I'd like to see a bit more room between the LDraw logo (which could be a tiny bit bigger) and OMR HomeI wanted the logo a little bigger too, but if it would be bigger, I would have to create a second header with the logo only (like on the main LDraw site). I didn't wanted to that, seemed like a waste of space. I tried to make the space between the logo and the OMR Home link bigger, but I couldn't get it done quickly, so I pushed it into the to-do list. It's not a major problem
![Wink Wink](https://forums.ldraw.org/images/smilies/wink.png)
Willy Tschager Wrote:* Finally the date of submission would be useful
I realised this too. The date of submission is already being recorded anyway, so it's just a matter of showing the data. I was also considering to add a date of the latest edit (so a creation date and a edit date).