Philippe Hurbain Wrote:Hilarious, isn't it?You got a weird sense of humor.
Thanks for tracking this down. Now I think about it, it's kinda logical as I'm handling the string to double conversion myself using 64 bit integers etc. So there is probably some overflow at play around the 64 bit number range.
I'll limit the input field and or try to improve the conversion code for additional precision (e.g. 128 bit).
ps: sorry I doubted your rotational skills
