>
Is the LSC being asked if (a) LDD-derived parts should have attribution in the history, or (b) if not-yet-real-but-probably-will-be parts can be submitted to the part tracker?
My answers would be (a)yes and (b)yes, but they should not be certified until the part physically exists.
In both cases, however, I am not sure why my opinion matters. I think the part tracker admins are more qualified to offer opinions on the subject.
Allen
Magnus Forsburg Wrote:> Hello Chris,
>
> I have seen a lot of parts extracted from LDD
> recently. Do/Should we have a policy on how to
> give credit to TLG on these parts?
>
> Maybe all should have to have a History line like
> this:
>
> 0 HISTORY 20??-??-?? {LEGO Digital Designer}
> Original part shape
> 0 !HISTORY 20??-??-?? [UserName] File preparation
> for LDraw Parts Tracker
>
> Do I dare publish this part, before it exists in
> any of LEGO's official sets?
>
> /
> Magnus
>
Is the LSC being asked if (a) LDD-derived parts should have attribution in the history, or (b) if not-yet-real-but-probably-will-be parts can be submitted to the part tracker?
My answers would be (a)yes and (b)yes, but they should not be certified until the part physically exists.
In both cases, however, I am not sure why my opinion matters. I think the part tracker admins are more qualified to offer opinions on the subject.
Allen