Perhaps we need something like this:
The period [one month] can be changed. These new rules simply reverse the old process where the author had to specify that the part was open for editing. Anyone who wishes to follow the old system can simply state as such.
Time suggestions:
Allen Smith: 0 delay
Tim Gould: 1 fortnight
Magnus Forsberg: one month
Max Martin Richter: 1 fortnight
Quote:In order to facilitate the speedy addition of parts to the official database, any part submitted to the part tracker shall be considered for open editing+ after [one calendar month] inaction* after any review. If a Part Author does not wish others to edit their submitted part, they should make a statement to that effect upon submission of the part. In such a case the part will only be considered open for editing after three calendar months inaction after a hold review, as before.
+ Open editing means that any Part Author can edit and resubmit the part.
* Inaction is defined as having no response by the original Part Author to a review.
The period [one month] can be changed. These new rules simply reverse the old process where the author had to specify that the part was open for editing. Anyone who wishes to follow the old system can simply state as such.
Time suggestions:
Allen Smith: 0 delay
Tim Gould: 1 fortnight
Magnus Forsberg: one month
Max Martin Richter: 1 fortnight