I realized in reading over some of this thread today what some of our misunderstandings have been...
7 and 8, the way we set up the spec (only in part files, TEXMAP is meant to bind decorations to parts instead of "design-by-architecture" means) shouldn't be an issue. The idea was to have a design encapsulated within a part definition, and the texture stack support was only for the very rare case that an s part need to have nested textures upon them, while the part using the s portion also was in the middle of a texture definition. So STEP shouldn't happen in the middle of a TEXMAP definition.
- joshua
7 and 8, the way we set up the spec (only in part files, TEXMAP is meant to bind decorations to parts instead of "design-by-architecture" means) shouldn't be an issue. The idea was to have a design encapsulated within a part definition, and the texture stack support was only for the very rare case that an s part need to have nested textures upon them, while the part using the s portion also was in the middle of a texture definition. So STEP shouldn't happen in the middle of a TEXMAP definition.
- joshua