Proposed change to !CATEGORY


RE: Proposed change to !CATEGORY
#12
(2026-04-03, 20:22)Orion Pobursky Wrote: There isn't any I'm aware of. It would just make things more explicit. It would also avoid new author confusion since the two word categories require a statement even if those words are first in the description.

Edit: I thought of one case: Minifig. Since there are two word categories that contain "Minifig" and Minifig by itself is a category, that can cause misfiling. It's why the Minifig category warning exists. We could solve this by depreciating "Minifig" in favor of, say, "Minifig Body".

I would like that.
Might also make some submission warnings less confusing.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Proposed change to !CATEGORY - by Chris Böhnke - Yesterday, 2:48

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)