![]() |
|
Proposed change to !CATEGORY - Printable Version +- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org) +-- Forum: General (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-12.html) +--- Forum: Official File Specifications/Standards (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-32.html) +--- Thread: Proposed change to !CATEGORY (/thread-29471.html) |
Proposed change to !CATEGORY - Orion Pobursky - 2026-04-03 What are the thoughts on abandoning the first word convention for !CATEGORY and have every part have an explicit !CATEGORY statement? RE: Proposed change to !CATEGORY - Travis Cobbs - 2026-04-03 (3 hours ago)Orion Pobursky Wrote: What are the thoughts on abandoning the first word convention for !CATEGORY and have every part have an explicit !CATEGORY statement? Is this because you expect parts to stop putting the category at the beginning their name, or just to make it more obvious what the category is? RE: Proposed change to !CATEGORY - Willy Tschager - 2026-04-03 (3 hours ago)Orion Pobursky Wrote: What are the thoughts on abandoning the first word convention for !CATEGORY and have every part have an explicit !CATEGORY statement? I thought we had that policy already in place? w. RE: Proposed change to !CATEGORY - Orion Pobursky - 2026-04-03 (1 hour ago)Travis Cobbs Wrote: Is this because you expect parts to stop putting the category at the beginning their name, or just to make it more obvious what the category is? The latter. RE: Proposed change to !CATEGORY - Manfred Schaefer - 2026-04-03 In my view, this would make sense, as it would allow the parts to be grouped according to their use. It might even be possible to have more than one group. Best regards, Manfred |