Proposed change to !CATEGORY

[N. W. Perry]

There isn't any I'm aware of. It would just make things more explicit. It would also avoid new author confusion since the two word categories require a statement even if those words are first in the description.

Edit: I thought of one case: Minifig. Since there are two word categories that contain "Minifig" and Minifig by itself is a category, that can cause misfiling. It's why the Minifig category warning exists. We could solve this by depreciating "Minifig" in favor of, say, "Minifig Body".

Hmm, and probably the same with "Constraction", "Figure" and "Sticker".

I do like the first word convention, it seems to help impose some orderliness in the naming of parts. I don't mind requiring a !CATEGORY statement, either, but that statement could be taken automatically from the first word if it matches an existing category.

What happens now if someone submits a part with no statement, and the first word doesn't match any established category?