RE: Proposed change to !CATEGORY
1 hour ago (This post was last modified: 1 hour ago by Orion Pobursky.)
1 hour ago (This post was last modified: 1 hour ago by Orion Pobursky.)
(2 hours ago)N. W. Perry Wrote: Are there examples of where the first-word convention is providing misleading results?
There isn't any I'm aware of. It would just make things more explicit. It would also avoid new author confusion since the two word categories require a statement even if those words are first in the description.
Edit: I thought of one case: Minifig. Since there are two word categories that contain "Minifig" and Minifig by itself is a category, that can cause misfiling. It's why the Minifig category warning exists. We could solve this by depreciating "Minifig" in favor of, say, "Minifig Body".
