RE: Incorrect reference to Bricklink
2026-02-17, 4:47 (This post was last modified: 2026-02-17, 4:47 by Chris Böhnke.)
2026-02-17, 4:47 (This post was last modified: 2026-02-17, 4:47 by Chris Böhnke.)
Sure it's this way around?
The error was me uploading that part a year or so ago with the incorrect links (and it got certified that way). Usually I could just overwrite that and the link is correct. But now this seems no longer possible, since the PT simply deletes my new RB keyword, thus keeps the old link.
Note that there are 2 versions of this (with different hands colour). As far as I can tell, RB is correct with their entry. It's just that 2 of our files link to the same RB page, instead of each separate one.
The error was me uploading that part a year or so ago with the incorrect links (and it got certified that way). Usually I could just overwrite that and the link is correct. But now this seems no longer possible, since the PT simply deletes my new RB keyword, thus keeps the old link.
Note that there are 2 versions of this (with different hands colour). As far as I can tell, RB is correct with their entry. It's just that 2 of our files link to the same RB page, instead of each separate one.