reviewing obsoleted parts


RE: reviewing obsoleted parts
#3
(2025-09-20, 3:02)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Geometry the same as the official part. 
No automated errors
A replacement exists

But really you should review the replacement at the same time.
How do I find the replacement? Should I be looking for a history line that would explain the reason?

If I have understood correctly, an obsoleted part should have the explicit obsolete category, "(obsolete)" at the end of the description, and a "~" at the start of the description. However, I haven't been able to verify these in the docs.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: reviewing obsoleted parts - by Peter Blomberg - 2025-09-20, 10:32

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)