71613/30346c01 too high?!


RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?!
#10
Given the part was edited in 2013 by someone who wasn't the original author, it very likely that this is a very old submission and the "data source" was manual measurements.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?! - by Jeff Jones - 2025-05-17, 13:28
RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?! - by Pawel2 - 2025-05-17, 15:36
RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?! - by Pawel2 - 2025-05-17, 17:25
RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?! - by Orion Pobursky - 2025-05-17, 19:53
RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?! - by Pawel2 - 2025-05-29, 7:02
RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?! - by Pawel2 - 2025-07-13, 16:24
RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?! - by Jeff Jones - 2025-07-13, 16:43
RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?! - by Jeff Jones - 2025-07-14, 19:35

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)