71613/30346c01 too high?!


RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?!
#9
   
added a line to compare
looks like there is really an error...
the original part is more "squished" at the slopes.
where is the original part data from? (digital/measured?)
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?! - by Jeff Jones - 2025-05-17, 13:28
RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?! - by Pawel2 - 2025-05-17, 15:36
RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?! - by Pawel2 - 2025-05-17, 17:25
RE: 71613/30346c01 too high?! - by Rene Rechthaler - 2025-05-17, 17:43

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)