(2024-11-13, 11:35)Rene Rechthaler Wrote: what about 973p01 -> 973p01c01
that would then be both print and assembly
and you can count the c01 up if there are more arm/hand combinations
This has already been ruled out
(2024-11-13, 11:35)Philo Wrote: Another possible scheme:
Name the first one 973pxxx -> 76382pxxx and/or 16360pxxx then if needed 76382pxxx-y and/or 16360pxxx-y with y in 0..9 and a..z
With your scheme torso assembly codes would block some torso codes...
Not a fan but don't have a specific reason why.