(2024-09-12, 18:25)Willy Tschager Wrote: No. There is something I call "Too much detail". You have to take into consideration that while making a pattern you're working on it isolated from the rest, where you get the feeling that more detail would render nicely.
How many time you're lookin' at a close-up of your head in a BI or a render of a set and how much would you gain compared to the bloat of a file 4 times bigger in size? The strenght of LDraw was also that the polycount was/is reasonable.
w.
Hello Willy,
I understand that there should be a good compromise in the level of detail and the number of polygons. The number of polygons also stands for the time needed for rendering.
Perhaps I expressed myself incorrectly in my question.
I don't want to replace the torus, but rather offer an additional torus with a higher resolution to avoid the above-mentioned gaps and overlaps when rendering in high resolution.
With the standard resolution, everything would be the same.
Regards
Manfred