Maybe it's just me, but the only reference I can find to the 0 Name meta-command is in the Official Library Header Specification. And that specifies that it is the path name inside parts/p. Shouldn't all the standard header metas be documented somewhere that describes what they are in a generic sense, and not the restricted sense of a library file header?
0 NAME and 0 FILE: to sync or not to sync?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
| Messages In This Thread |
|
0 NAME and 0 FILE: to sync or not to sync? - by N. W. Perry - 2024-05-20, 19:32
RE: 0 NAME and 0 FILE: to sync or not to sync? - by Orion Pobursky - 2024-05-20, 20:57
RE: 0 NAME and 0 FILE: to sync or not to sync? - by Roland Melkert - 2024-05-20, 20:57
RE: 0 NAME and 0 FILE: to sync or not to sync? - by N. W. Perry - 2024-05-20, 22:04
RE: 0 NAME and 0 FILE: to sync or not to sync? - by Travis Cobbs - 2024-05-21, 1:17
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)