Complementary conds


RE: Complementary conds
#6
(2023-01-17, 21:15)Roland Melkert Wrote: Sorry for joining in late, for some reason I thought this was a library admin thing.

The proposed text alone didn't sink in with me, but judging on the images it seems a decent thing to do.

Only alternative would be to have 'fade over' primitives or primitives without the last and/or first conlines as far I understand it.

But then again I'm not a part designer, so I'm ok with whatever the authors prefer.

Just to be clear, this is describing behavior that is already taking place in the parts library. It has been that way for a long time, but it has never been documented, and this change is simply designed to document the reality that already exists.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Complementary conds - by Willy Tschager - 2023-01-10, 9:25
RE: Complementary conds - by Travis Cobbs - 2023-01-15, 2:24
RE: Complementary conds - by Travis Cobbs - 2023-01-16, 1:52
RE: Complementary conds - by Roland Melkert - 2023-01-17, 21:15
RE: Complementary conds - by Travis Cobbs - 2023-01-18, 2:56

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)