(2020-02-24, 16:35)Gerald Lasser Wrote:
- x508a, x508b and also x508, u886ac01, u886bc01:
-> Naming: Should the "stand-alone hooks", x508a and x508b carry a different name? i.e. some "u"-name?
should u886ac01 and u886bc01 be renamed to a x508a and x508b, i.e. that their name reflects their relationship for consistency? What would we name the hooks then? OR should x508 be renamed to u886c?
Both of these numbers are unknown, x508 and u866.
I think we can solve this by giving the three different hook+plate assemblies/part a single new number.
I suggest renumbering:
u886ac01 => u9XXXa (a shortcut made of u886a + x508a)
u886bc01 => u9XXXb (a shortcut made of u886b + x508b)
x508 => u9XXXc (a part made of s/u886s01 + s/x508s01)