(2019-01-11, 15:33)Orion Pobursky Wrote: My opinion:Fully agree. Especially since getting a good texmap image can take quite a bit of time, so requiring a fallback would add even more work for a texmapped part than for a triangulated pattern alone!
The TEXMAP standard has be out for 6 years. All actively developed LDraw editors support it and any new one's can't call themselves LDraw.org compatible unless they do. I don't think we should require any patterned fallback detail except to complete the geometry of a part.
TEXMAP fallback
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread |
TEXMAP fallback - by Orion Pobursky - 2019-01-11, 15:33
RE: TEXMAP fallback - by Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-11, 18:47
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)