+- LDraw.org Discussion Forums (https://forums.ldraw.org)
+-- Forum: General (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-12.html)
+--- Forum: Parts Tracker Discussion (https://forums.ldraw.org/forum-36.html)
+--- Thread: TEXMAP fallback (/thread-23148.html)
TEXMAP fallback - Orion Pobursky - 2019-01-11
I think we need to have a discussion on how detailed the fallback for a TEXMAP part need to be.
My opinion:
The TEXMAP standard has be out for 6 years. All actively developed LDraw editors support it and any new one's can't call themselves LDraw.org compatible unless they do. I don't think we should require any patterned fallback detail except to complete the geometry of a part.
RE: TEXMAP fallback - Philippe Hurbain - 2019-01-11
(2019-01-11, 15:33)Orion Pobursky Wrote: My opinion:Fully agree. Especially since getting a good texmap image can take quite a bit of time, so requiring a fallback would add even more work for a texmapped part than for a triangulated pattern alone!
The TEXMAP standard has be out for 6 years. All actively developed LDraw editors support it and any new one's can't call themselves LDraw.org compatible unless they do. I don't think we should require any patterned fallback detail except to complete the geometry of a part.