we need a "comments" section at the OMR
(2018-02-03, 18:01)Orion Pobursky Wrote: I am stridently against any type of PT like review process. I’d rather have flawed models in the OMR than have them go through the review hell that Parts are subject to. For the OMR I’d rather err on inclusion as opposed to the PT which errs on exclusion. That’s said, I’m not opposed to some sort of objective grading system but has to be automated and not subject to interpretation.
| Messages In This Thread |
|
we need a "comments" section at the OMR - by Steffen - 2018-02-02, 21:43
RE: we need a "comments" section at the OMR - by Orion Pobursky - 2018-02-02, 22:39
RE: we need a "comments" section at the OMR - by Orion Pobursky - 2018-02-02, 22:40
RE: we need a "comments" section at the OMR - by Merlijn Wissink - 2018-02-03, 8:57
Idea for OMR - by Steffen - 2018-02-03, 10:31
RE: Idea for OMR - by Orion Pobursky - 2018-02-03, 18:01
RE: Idea for OMR - by Philippe Hurbain - 2018-02-03, 18:45
RE: Idea for OMR - by Willy Tschager - 2018-02-03, 20:36
RE: we need a "comments" section at the OMR - by Steffen - 2018-02-03, 10:34
RE: we need a "comments" section at the OMR - by Merlijn Wissink - 2018-02-03, 11:57
git backend - by Steffen - 2018-02-03, 10:36
RE: git backend - by Michael Horvath - 2018-02-03, 23:32
RE: git backend - by Steffen - 2018-02-04, 13:00
|
