RE: Idea for OMR
2018-02-03, 18:01 (This post was last modified: 2018-02-03, 18:33 by Orion Pobursky.)
2018-02-03, 18:01 (This post was last modified: 2018-02-03, 18:33 by Orion Pobursky.)
(2018-02-03, 10:31)Steffen Wrote: May I suggest a radical but simple idea here:
Idea: use the existing PT for OMR models.
they would be submitted into a new folder "omr", or, what I would like even much better, into "models".
(because that's what they are.)
We then could use the normal existing submit + review mechanisms of the existing PT for checking them.
When the parts tracker is used to make a release, the "models" folder simply will not be included in the final release.
Instead, a separate "omr" (or better: "models") release could be added in a later step.
I am stridently against any type of PT like review process. I’d rather have flawed models in the OMR than have them go through the review hell that Parts are subject to. For the OMR I’d rather err on inclusion as opposed to the PT which errs on exclusion. That’s said, I’m not opposed to some sort of objective grading system but has to be automated and not subject to interpretation.