> I scrapped the idea however, since then there would be no control at all over the file (quality).
Right now you have the opposite effect:
- there are mistakes in the OMR files which don't get reported
- the submittal process is manually tedious (collecting from forum posts, tracking where the corrected versions are, etc.)
So you now have minor quality _plus_ tedious manual work.
Having a self-submitting and review mechanism, you could drop the handwork, _plus_ would get better quality.
I think the absolute minimum would be a "comments" section at each model, where spotted problems can be reported,
and marked with a checkmark if the model author has resolved that problem.
Right now you have the opposite effect:
- there are mistakes in the OMR files which don't get reported
- the submittal process is manually tedious (collecting from forum posts, tracking where the corrected versions are, etc.)
So you now have minor quality _plus_ tedious manual work.
Having a self-submitting and review mechanism, you could drop the handwork, _plus_ would get better quality.
I think the absolute minimum would be a "comments" section at each model, where spotted problems can be reported,
and marked with a checkmark if the model author has resolved that problem.