(2016-10-24, 19:41)Magnus Forsberg Wrote:(2016-10-22, 3:17)Orion Pobursky Wrote: Do we add the BL part number as a keyword if it differs from the LDraw number?
There is already a small group of parts that have a keyword "Bricklink XXX "
Only 17 examples exists today. Four of them have been made official parts.
We have ~2725 parts using the word Pattern in the description.
Is there anyone who would want to do that job and recreate the link between LDraw and Bricklink pattern numbers? I don't.
Why should we favor Bricklink numbers? I think we should work on the LEGO-Ldraw connection instead.
I agree not retroactively processing the entire library. My thoughts were more to current and future parts on the PT