Merlijn Wissink Wrote:And in the end, the files are not as 'important' as the parts right? I mean, people make the LDraw files of sets for fun and people download them for fun.I think people model parts mainly for fun too, and whilst part quality might be more important to the commuinity than model quality, I would like to see the LDraw 'brand' maintain its reputation for high quality deliverables.
Merlijn Wissink Wrote:It doesn't matter that much if the file isn't certified by x amount of people and checked for a long list of errors.
I didn't suggest a value for 'x', just that a certification process is my preference. Although for parts x=3, for models it might only need to be 1 (anyone, or the OMR admin).
Merlijn Wissink Wrote:If it is correct and not a complete mess, it's fine for 99% of the time the file is used.That's the whole point of a certification process. Despite their best efforts, authors make mistakes so it makes sense [to me] to have some peer review.
I do think authentication is important to ensure that authors are happy for the LDraw organisation to share their work.
Chris (LDraw Parts Library Admin)