1) I think there's a bit of miscommunication. Yes, you are right a about the fact that 'official' might be misleading.
2) You're completely right. When making the page I couldn't come up with the right word
, so I just used submodel. But, indeed, it should be alternate.
3) That's a nice suggestion and easy to change.
4) Well, this is actually a bit the same as at number 1: do we allow users submitting files or not? If yes, you should indeed have a indication if the model is checked or not. But, again, the opinions about user-content seem to be divided.
Quote:"Please keep in mind that the files beeing OMR compliant doesn't make them correct."But this is not completely true. There is actually some kind of 'review proces'. As the website is now, only admins can log in and add/edit the LDraw files. Users themselves cannot upload files themselves. I think we should decide if we want to allow that or not (or maybe at a later stage). I personally think the admin-only approach is fine. Having users upload files themselves can attract trolls or just very bad LDraw files. Even if we would check if the file is OMR compliant doesn't say anything about the actual content of the file. It can be a mess of parts. And since it's not a huge workload to add maybe a few sets per week, I think a few admins can handle that (I can even do it on my own if needed). But, it seems the opinions are divided.
2) You're completely right. When making the page I couldn't come up with the right word
, so I just used submodel. But, indeed, it should be alternate.3) That's a nice suggestion and easy to change.
4) Well, this is actually a bit the same as at number 1: do we allow users submitting files or not? If yes, you should indeed have a indication if the model is checked or not. But, again, the opinions about user-content seem to be divided.