Thanks for checking my files, Roland.
You are right about 15279.dat - this is my mistake, it shows how your version differs to the previous one of mine. So no change in this file since your last update.
The garbage in 59228s02.dat surprises me as well because I did not edit this file in any external editor. LDCad is what saved this. But why? And was it my mistake? How can I even put so much of garbage to the edit field? I do not know. Please: for the file itself, ignore that garbage. Only it may be interesting about is to check LDCad if it might be caused by any bug. (What I suggest to spent time on only if/after it happens again...)
Also thank you for your explanation about ID vs. Group fields. I'm not 100% sure I understand that but that's the advantage of a written form: I may read it again and again until I start to understand. Meanwhile, I take it as a simple rule: Milan, do not use ID field!
You are right about 15279.dat - this is my mistake, it shows how your version differs to the previous one of mine. So no change in this file since your last update.
The garbage in 59228s02.dat surprises me as well because I did not edit this file in any external editor. LDCad is what saved this. But why? And was it my mistake? How can I even put so much of garbage to the edit field? I do not know. Please: for the file itself, ignore that garbage. Only it may be interesting about is to check LDCad if it might be caused by any bug. (What I suggest to spent time on only if/after it happens again...)
Also thank you for your explanation about ID vs. Group fields. I'm not 100% sure I understand that but that's the advantage of a written form: I may read it again and again until I start to understand. Meanwhile, I take it as a simple rule: Milan, do not use ID field!