The socket-primitive is now reworked and all affected parts have been adapted to it.
I would like to renumber it too. "joint-8-socket-frica.dat" is too long.
IMO, the filename should not be used to "describe" the file content. It should be as short as possible.
I even think that we don't need these new ball/socket-primitives.
To me, it isn't a good idea to create all the differently shaped socket primitives, as seen above.
They are only used once or twice in a few parts each, and don't tell the software programmer how they are allowed to move.
They are sub-files, not primitives.
I don't see how the creation of these four new primitives solves the connection problem, if we also need to have the information about how they are allowed to move in a separate library.
I would like to renumber it too. "joint-8-socket-frica.dat" is too long.
IMO, the filename should not be used to "describe" the file content. It should be as short as possible.
I even think that we don't need these new ball/socket-primitives.
To me, it isn't a good idea to create all the differently shaped socket primitives, as seen above.
They are only used once or twice in a few parts each, and don't tell the software programmer how they are allowed to move.
They are sub-files, not primitives.
I don't see how the creation of these four new primitives solves the connection problem, if we also need to have the information about how they are allowed to move in a separate library.