Third voting option?

[Peter Blomberg]

Would it be worthwhile to create a vote/mark in addition to "hold" for the purpose of highlighting imperfections that are not ground for a hold?

A reviewer could use it to mark parts that they have processed and found wanting, to prevent it from appearing on self-made todo-lists. A kind of "hide this part" from me until changes have been made to it.

I see two possible uses of such an in-between vote:

1. "Hide this part - I don't want to review it."
   
2. "Signal the author that the part could be improved, yet leaving other reviewers the possibility to certify the part without any changes."
   

[Orion Pobursky]

1. "Hide this part - I don't want to review it."
   

This is the easiest option to implement and can be done as a user settable flag (akin to the tracking flag). I'd envision this flag being reset upon a submit action. Does that align with what you're thinking?

[Peter Blomberg]

This is the easiest option to implement and can be done as a user settable flag (akin to the tracking flag). I'd envision this flag being reset upon a submit action. Does that align with what you're thinking?

Yes, that would be perfect!

[Orion Pobursky]

Second question. Where should this filter exist?

[Peter Blomberg]

Second question. Where should this filter exist?

I usually search for parts to review in the parts tracker so having that as a filter option there would be nice.

I usually detect a part I cannot review when reviewing it, so setting the flag could be done on the page where I'd vote.