LDraw.org Discussion Forums

Full Version: Gerald's Parts and Pieces Thread
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6
(2018-04-26, 7:27)Gerald Lasser Wrote: [ -> ]Shall be up tonight, Cond-Lines missing.
I just noticed (from pictures) that the 8L and 16L versions do not share the middle sections.
So I might have done some surplus sub-filing. Currently three of them, End, Middle and End-Middle section.
Looks very good. Though I doubt that the flat top on bars was worth modeling...
(2018-04-26, 12:11)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: [ -> ]
(2018-04-26, 7:27)Gerald Lasser Wrote: [ -> ]Shall be up tonight, Cond-Lines missing.
I just noticed (from pictures) that the 8L and 16L versions do not share the middle sections.
So I might have done some surplus sub-filing. Currently three of them, End, Middle and End-Middle section.
Looks very good. Though I doubt that the flat top on bars was worth modeling...

The flat part is "necessary" for the cart to roll. :-)
If the flat top is not there the wheel would intersect with the bar.
(2018-04-26, 12:17)Gerald Lasser Wrote: [ -> ]
(2018-04-26, 12:11)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: [ -> ]Looks very good. Though I doubt that the flat top on bars was worth modeling...

The flat part is "necessary" for the cart to roll. :-)
If the flat top is not there the wheel would intersect with the bar.
Then it was VERY worth ;D
Note to self: don't criticise without parts in hands!
...a new track part!
https://youtu.be/_FMNbRm0wDM?t=48s (the straight slope).
(2018-04-26, 17:50)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: [ -> ]...a new track part!
https://youtu.be/_FMNbRm0wDM?t=48s (the straight slope).
That one makes it really versatile. To go up in a proper straight and not in an s-motion (like the monorail :-))
I did part 35700 from the Series 18 Figs and based it on 61780.

When doing the measurements they were slightly off, so I have made three versions, as seen in th epicture:

a) Yellow, based on the pure 61780 design (low line cout, just 47)

b) Orange, proper sized fingers for stacking (64 lines in subfile, plus 104 lines -> optimize to 64 in main Sub, 15 in finger sub, 60 in main file)

c) exact replica with quarter cutouts on the fingers (64 in main sub, 60 in finger sub, 68 in final file)

[attachment=3169]

I would go for (b), what do you think?
Is it just me (I'm using my tiny phone screen) or the picture is missing?
Edit: Now using my computer - the picture IS missing Wink
(2018-05-06, 17:02)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: [ -> ]Is it just me (I'm using my tiny phone screen) or the picture is missing?
Edit: Now using my computer - the picture IS missing Wink

...mmhhh, added the comparison Cool
Quote:I would go for (b), what do you think?
Agreed...
(2018-04-26, 13:01)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: [ -> ]
(2018-04-26, 12:17)Gerald Lasser Wrote: [ -> ]The flat part is "necessary" for the cart to roll. :-)
If the flat top is not there the wheel would intersect with the bar.
Then it was VERY worth ;D
Note to self: don't criticise without parts in hands!
OK, now I (finally!!!) do have the parts in hands and still don't see the need for the flat top: lower part of wheel is about 2 mm above the bars!
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6