Part 11090 hole depth variant

[Peter Grass]

The 11090 in BI has a longer interior bar hole than the current 11090 part on the tracker and there does seem to be a newer version of the part as mentioned in this reddit post to confirm there needs to be a variant made.

https://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/1...ants_with/

[Philippe Hurbain]

The 11090 in BI has a longer interior bar hole than the current 11090 part on the tracker and there does seem to be a newer version of the part as mentioned in this reddit post to confirm there needs to be a variant made.

https://www.reddit.com/r/lego/comments/1...ants_with/

There is something indeed... Here is a comparison of the various mesh revisions used in building instructions (placed in sequence a..h). The weirdest is the shallower hole in revision f...??

[Peter Grass]

Do we know what date they swapped over or are they still using version F in more modern sets too?

[Philippe Hurbain]

Do we know what date they swapped over or are they still using version F in more modern sets too?

No information about dates, it would necessitate to explore a lot of sets, which is tedious at best...

[Magnus Forsberg]

But we need a version this that small pinhole, since it is a usable connection point.

RB:
Mold version11090 has a hole large enough to fit the pin on accessory parts (eg. plume/flame/feather part 64647). The hole in the later version 44873 is too small. 

[Sylvain Sauvage]

But we need a version this that small pinhole, since it is a usable connection point.

RB:
Mold version11090 has a hole large enough to fit the pin on accessory parts (eg. plume/flame/feather part 64647). The hole in the later version 44873 is too small. 

The hole is large enough but I’m not sure it’s an intended connection (proof being it’s not in the other moulds).