Fixed Error with 44568 (official part) ?


Error with 44568 (official part) ?
#1
Thumbs Up 
Hi again.

It seems there's an error with 44568. The usage of p\clh6 is not correct since it's symetrical and the two fingers are not on this part.

I have this part on my desk right now and I see the same that's shown on this picture :
[Image: 6276045.jpg]

Does it exist two versions of this part, one with symetrical fingers and one without ?
Reply
RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ?
#2
looks like you are correct and the official part is wrong...
fortunately, the correct "fingers are already there:
https://library.ldraw.org/official/29539
https://library.ldraw.org/official/29540
in this part: https://library.ldraw.org/official/26031
maybe its sufficient to fix it by just replacing it.
(the new fingers are much newer than the part)
Reply
RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ?
#3
(2024-08-17, 10:18)Rene Rechthaler Wrote: looks like you are correct and the official part is wrong...
fortunately, the correct "fingers are already there:
https://library.ldraw.org/official/29539
https://library.ldraw.org/official/29540
in this part: https://library.ldraw.org/official/26031
maybe its sufficient to fix it by just replacing it.
(the new fingers are much newer than the part)

Are there 2 versions or not?
Reply
RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ?
#4
checked my parts: they are all the same (with the up/down fingers)
-> official part is wrong
Reply
RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ?
#5
Rene is right, only up/down are existing. I think we had this discussion somewhere in the forum. I made the prim, but I can't remember why the part was not touched.
Reply
RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ?
#6
Do you then want to fix the part (since the prims are yours)?
Reply
RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ?
#7
corrected including other geometry

https://library.ldraw.org/tracker/39839
Reply
RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ?
#8
(2024-08-17, 11:57)Gerald Lasser Wrote: corrected including other geometry

https://library.ldraw.org/tracker/39839

What's the benefit of this design?
Reply
RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ?
#9
I guess the force required to disassemble the two parts of the hinges is less, you can twist it....

Edit: After doing some tests, I can't really tell what's better
Reply
RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ?
#10
same reason why 95120.dat has holes through the bottom: to get an easier molding...
if there are two full dents facing each other, it would be quite difficult to unmold.
Reply
RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ?
#11
(2024-08-17, 15:28)Rene Rechthaler Wrote: same reason why 95120.dat has holes through the bottom: to get an easier molding...
if there are two full dents facing each other, it would be quite difficult to unmold.

yes, of course :facepalm:
Reply
RE: Error with 44568 (official part) ?
#12
thank you everybody.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)