Wigs 18639 or 92255?


Wigs 18639 or 92255?
#1
Hi all,

I was looking for this wig part 6086929 which is this one:
https://brickset.com/parts/design-18639

[Image: 6086929.jpg]

It is not done in LDraw, but I found this one:
https://brickset.com/parts/design-92255

[Image: 4596240.jpg]

This one is in LDraw!
Are these the same? Or at least almost the same?

The only difference I can spot is that the second one is from 2012 and also comes in brown.

The first one is from 2013 and also comes in yellow and brown, which seems to be from 2016?
Jaco van der Molen
lpub.binarybricks.nl
Reply
RE: Wigs 18639 or 92255?
#2
Since they have the same name (WIG, STRAIGHT 1), yes, I think they are the same. The rendering of both images is the same too... So yet another alias!
Reply
RE: Wigs 18639 or 92255?
#3
(2017-06-13, 19:25)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: Since they have the same name (WIG, STRAIGHT 1), yes, I think they are the same. The rendering of both images is the same too... So yet another alias!

So should we create 18639.dat as an alias of 92255? Or have you done this?
Jaco van der Molen
lpub.binarybricks.nl
Reply
RE: Wigs 18639 or 92255?
#4
(2017-06-14, 6:45)Jaco van der Molen Wrote:
(2017-06-13, 19:25)Philippe Hurbain Wrote: Since they have the same name (WIG, STRAIGHT 1), yes, I think they are the same. The rendering of both images is the same too... So yet another alias!

So should we create 18639.dat as an alias of 92255? Or have you done this?
Please do it if you feel like it Wink
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)