Standards for stud groups
2011-11-15, 10:08 (This post was last modified: 2011-12-10, 9:41 by Willy Tschager.)
2011-11-15, 10:08 (This post was last modified: 2011-12-10, 9:41 by Willy Tschager.)
Firstly, hello and congratulations to the new LSC.
Secondly... stud groups. I'd really appreciate some clarity.
Personally I think any basic plate should potentially have an equivalent stud group and certainly the small ones. Mike and Steffen disagree.
Luckily we have a team of people who can resolve this issue officially once and for all. I'm happy to go with whatever is decided but I'd like to see a decision. In the grand scheme of things it's a minor issue but it's one that Mike felt strongly enough about to place a hold and I felt strongly enough about to disagree with the hold.
And a note on the solution should be added to the primitives reference page. Which I shall do when it happens.
Cheers,
Tim
Secondly... stud groups. I'd really appreciate some clarity.
Personally I think any basic plate should potentially have an equivalent stud group and certainly the small ones. Mike and Steffen disagree.
Luckily we have a team of people who can resolve this issue officially once and for all. I'm happy to go with whatever is decided but I'd like to see a decision. In the grand scheme of things it's a minor issue but it's one that Mike felt strongly enough about to place a hold and I felt strongly enough about to disagree with the hold.
And a note on the solution should be added to the primitives reference page. Which I shall do when it happens.
Cheers,
Tim