[Thoughts wanted] Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst


Re: [Thoughts wanted] V3 - Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst
#19
PS. According to the Perl library XML::Simple, both attributes and sub-tags are equivalent. I'm not sure this is proper behaviour though. If it is, then Mike's file format and mine are equivalent representations of the same data.

Tim
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: [Thoughts wanted] V3 - Parts.xml - xml improvement on Part.lst - by Tim Gould - 2013-02-04, 2:06

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)