0 Name: entry - needless ?


Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ?
#3
Yes, exactly. The current written text about the 0 Name: tag is on one hand not enough to understand and on the other hand wrong!

So a clarification is highly wished by me.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Tim Gould - 2012-12-15, 23:57
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Michael Heidemann - 2012-12-16, 16:48
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Chris Dee - 2012-12-18, 12:43
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Steffen - 2012-12-19, 1:49
Re: 0 Name: entry - needless ? - by Steffen - 2012-12-19, 18:04

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)