Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst


Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst
#22
These files frustrate me to no end when building, and I want to make them as difficult to access in my part browser as possible.

Please add a prefix. I prefer '_' because it is already well-established for identifying parts one should never actually use in a model. It is also already supported in software, meaning less work for software authors if you don't define a new prefix. For example, underscore-prefixed parts already get forced into Bricksmith's Alias category, where people are very unlikely to accidentally find them.

If you are going to use a different prefix, please let me know what it is so I can adapt accordingly.

Allen
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Should "Part Alias" files be listed in parts.lst - by Allen Smith - 2012-04-09, 0:47

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)