That's messy, indeed. I compared 3817 with 3817b. Beside the sloped back the new leg itself is also way smaller than 3817. My question is:
If we move the foot also the flat front in 3817b:
4 4 -2 7.657 -4 -18.804 7.399 -4 -19.23 20 -4 -1.5 20 -4
has to be moved forward?
We have currently 67 patterns of 3817b. Way more than of 3817. I don't think that returing to the original 3817 is a good idea. If possible we should use whatever we can from 3817 b and cycle them to 3817c.
w.
If we move the foot also the flat front in 3817b:
4 4 -2 7.657 -4 -18.804 7.399 -4 -19.23 20 -4 -1.5 20 -4
has to be moved forward?
We have currently 67 patterns of 3817b. Way more than of 3817. I don't think that returing to the original 3817 is a good idea. If possible we should use whatever we can from 3817 b and cycle them to 3817c.
w.
LEGO ergo sum