92946 vs. 15672


RE: 92946 vs. 15672
#4
(2021-11-14, 16:02)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: I haven't dug into your designs yet, but how do you deal with the fact that all ldraw 45 sloped parts are wrong?
Pic14-16 in that article show that the tip shoud have a height of 5 ldu, but all of our 45 slopes have only a 4 ldu height.
Moving the wall forward an lovering the top is maybe not the correct solution here.

I'm well aware that all slopes are wrong and that despite reality all LDraw have no seam. This was the most natual thing to do. Feel free to suggest a better solution. I could obviously move the wall back, which would move the height of 92946 back to normal and cover the gap in 15672 with a small quad by leaving the top edge of the slope where it is.

w.
LEGO ergo sum
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
92946 vs. 15672 - by Willy Tschager - 2021-11-14, 12:59
RE: 92946 vs. 15672 - by Philippe Hurbain - 2021-11-14, 14:08
RE: 92946 vs. 15672 - by Magnus Forsberg - 2021-11-14, 16:02
RE: 92946 vs. 15672 - by Willy Tschager - 2021-11-14, 16:25
RE: 92946 vs. 15672 - by Willy Tschager - 2021-11-16, 10:56
RE: 92946 vs. 15672 - by Magnus Forsberg - 2021-11-18, 20:05
RE: 92946 vs. 15672 - by N. W. Perry - 2021-11-14, 19:11

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)