92946 vs. 15672


RE: 92946 vs. 15672
#2
Seems good to me. I just suggest to change sides triangulation to
Code:
4 16 10 0 -.5 10 8 -20 10 8 20 10 0 20
4 16 10 4 -20 10 0 -.5 10 -14 -.5 10 -14 -2.45
3 16 10 4 -20 10 8 -20 10 0 -.5
as it provides better smoothing.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
92946 vs. 15672 - by Willy Tschager - 2021-11-14, 12:59
RE: 92946 vs. 15672 - by Philippe Hurbain - 2021-11-14, 14:08
RE: 92946 vs. 15672 - by Magnus Forsberg - 2021-11-14, 16:02
RE: 92946 vs. 15672 - by Willy Tschager - 2021-11-14, 16:25
RE: 92946 vs. 15672 - by Willy Tschager - 2021-11-16, 10:56
RE: 92946 vs. 15672 - by Magnus Forsberg - 2021-11-18, 20:05
RE: 92946 vs. 15672 - by N. W. Perry - 2021-11-14, 19:11

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)