LDCad 1.7 Alpha 1 (win+linux)

[Roland Melkert]

Yeah, that should be right.

I'm revisiting this issue as I'm double checking my todo list.

Doing so I noticed an issue with step part counts which isn't really a bug (I think) but probably very weird to an end user.

In your 8448.mpd?suspFront.ldr from above:

step 13
part cnt in step 21, part cnt in model: 486
step 14
part cnt in step 353, part cnt in model: 834
step 15
part cnt in step 353, part cnt in model: 486
step 16
part cnt in step 5, part cnt in model: 486

This 'feels' wrong but I guess it's actually correct, because:

Step 14 -> you clear the model and add the suspRear model to it.
Step 15 -> you restore step 13 and add the suspRear model to it.

So from the context of step 14 there are two suspRear instances active in the model resulting in the higher model part count.

Just looking for some thoughts about how this should act/work.