Extension for material properties?


RE: Extension for material properties?
#4
(2020-09-30, 21:24)Magnus Forsberg Wrote: But I think we all agreed on that no added info should be forced into the dat-files.
We don't want to recycle any file to add any metadata info.

Yeah. By "metadata" (and perhaps I'm misusing the term), I mean something separate and apart from the "data"—just as shadow libraries are now used. A user could add the info to any part, either in a joined file or by appending the .dat file itself, but no .dat would be made non-compliant by not having it.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
RE: Extension for material properties? - by N. W. Perry - 2020-09-30, 23:14

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)