Naming Convention for Text Primitives

[Ulrich Röder]

Italic and Condenced fonts should be made by deforming the primitive.

Code:

1 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 typeswn1.dat
1 16 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 typeswn2.dat
1 16 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 typeswn3.dat
1 16 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 typeswn4.dat

1 16 0 0 1 1 0 .5 0 1 0 0 0 1 typeswn1.dat
1 16 1 0 1 1 0 .5 0 1 0 0 0 1 typeswn2.dat
1 16 2 0 1 1 0 .5 0 1 0 0 0 1 typeswn3.dat
1 16 3 0 1 1 0 .5 0 1 0 0 0 1 typeswn4.dat

1 16 0 0 2 .5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 typeswn1.dat
1 16 1 0 2 .5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 typeswn2.dat
1 16 2 0 2 .5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 typeswn3.dat
1 16 3 0 2 .5 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 typeswn4.dat

Bold otoh is more difficult to create by deforming.

That was already in my mind .... so far .... when I pondered it, Magnus.

But doing that simply over the matrix does not give really nice and well matching results in relation to the original.
As you said ... with "Bold" it will be difficult and that's where the focus of my question lay.

I guess, a "Normal" and  a "Bold" Variation  of a Typegroup would be a good solution....and more clean.