Streamlining the exchange of models that use unofficial parts

Re: IMHO, the backlog is the problem
Sadly I cannot review any of those lovely parts because I don't have them.

I'd like to see the policies altered slightly so that the PT Admin _can_ release a part with _no holds_ and at least one certify if it has been on the PT for more than two years. With the caveat that it be brought to the attention of reviewers first.

I think this would be valid since ultimately PT Admin is responsible for positioning, orientation and naming.

I know I repeat myself but I think that the Parts Library can suffer from excessive attention to non-functional detail at the expense of speed.

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
IMHO, the backlog is the problem - by Steffen - 2011-12-01, 14:06
Re: IMHO, the backlog is the problem - by Tim Gould - 2011-12-01, 22:43

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)