Pneumatic valve naming


Re: Pneumatic valve naming
#2
This is really a difficult question and I have currently no good solution.

But this leads to a decision that we should make now. Never naming physical states just with ..a, ...b, etc.
For these different physical states we should use in the future something like 4567_p1.dat.
If we use such an underscore and then something more descriptive like position 1 it will hopefully prevent us for the future from such a naming chaos that we are now faced.

Maybe we need to introduce something similar for the different variants of a part. We know there are many. Often we do not care about small changes. If we introduce an ending "-v" followed by a number for the variants we are free for many other options.
The number without the "-v" is then a "-v0".

Just two cents from me.
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Pneumatic valve naming - by Philippe Hurbain - 2015-10-17, 12:17
Re: Pneumatic valve naming - by Michael Heidemann - 2015-10-17, 16:20
Re: Pneumatic valve naming - by Steffen - 2015-12-19, 20:05
RE: Pneumatic valve naming - by Chris Dee - 2016-08-20, 6:43
RE: Pneumatic valve naming - by Chris Dee - 2016-08-20, 8:17
RE: Pneumatic valve naming - by Chris Dee - 2016-08-21, 11:26

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)