New header meta proposal: 0 !BOM

Re: New header meta proposal: 0 !BOM
parts.lst only holds the dat name and description, I maintain my own cache file (parts.inv) with LDCad which also hold category, keywords, location information and some attributes (e.g. shortcut) and it does this for all registered libraries combined.

I don't know what LPub uses but I don't think it would need much change to use the annotation meta if it becomes official.

On that matter I'm still waiting on the thoughts of the other LSB members about this meta, or should I start a topic in the LSB forum ?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
Re: New header meta proposal: 0 !BOM - by Roland Melkert - 2015-05-21, 16:28

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)