LDraw.org Discussion Forums › General › Official File Specifications/Standards v
Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives?

Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives?


Orion Pobursky Offline
Administrator *******
Administrators App Developers James Jessiman Memorial PTAdmin PTSubmit Standards Board Steering Committee
Posts: 4,465
Threads: 622
Joined: Jul 2011
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives?
#2
2014-11-04, 12:39
I see his point on CW vs. CCW for non-primitive parts. Pick one for the library (CCW is the de-facto standard I think). I still think INVERTNEXT is needed for legacy purposes but modern programs can simply do primitive substitution.
Find
Reply
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »



Messages In This Thread
Re: Need for BFC INVERTNEXT / primitives? - by Orion Pobursky - 2014-11-04, 12:39

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)